Justin Vernon
The Bon Iver frontman has been ruling the blogosphere this week. Ben Clark
It almost sounds like the setup to a bad Bon Iver joke: How famous is Justin Vernon these days? So famous that even him not doing something is notable enough to make headlines.
Such is the case with this weekend’s non-performance by Bon Iver at the Grammys, which “reportedly” (we’ll get to why that word is in quotes momentarily) was passed up by Vernon and his managers because they would have been forced into a collaborative performance with unnamed artists. Fair enough; other collaborations planned for the Grammys include the puzzling pairing of the Beach Boys, who will perform with Brian Wilson for the first time in 25 years, with Maroon 5 and Foster the People, and a tribute to electronic music that will include Chris Brown, Lil Wayne, David Guetta, Deadmau5, and, inexplicably, the Foo Fighters.
But the real troubling aspect of this non-Bon story is how quickly it has spread on the basis of one trivial, flimsy narrative. We’ve come to expect the “reporting” of Bon Iver minutia from Pitchfork, who salivate over Vernon’s every tweet and rush to blog about them, but it appears that Iver fever has caught on in outlets closer to home. In his three weeks at the helm of the City Pages music section, new editor Reed Fischer has managed to file five different pieces about Bon Iver, four of which centered around how, why, and in what promotional capacity the band would be involved in this Sunday’s Grammys. Currently, the most-read post on the Gimme Noise blog is Fischer’s post “Bon Iver 'kind of said 'f*** you' a little bit' to the Grammys,” which reblogs something Vernon told a Billboard reporter at a Bushmills promotional event and subsequently pats him on the back for his defiance. And now, in the act of typing out that sentence, the echo chamber has grown to a deafening roar and I can barely hear myself think; the blog-to-blog-to-blog game of telephone has practically pushed Bon Iver into meme territory. Look no further than Hipster Runoff’s ridiculous series of Vernon-related posts to see more evidence of that tiresome trend.
Ever since Bon Iver’s four Grammy nominations were announced, reporters have been scrambling to unearth fragments of old interviews with Vernon and position him in various compromising dialogs with himself. For some peace of mind, I thought I might as well do the same and see if any of my conversations with Vernon might help to make some sense of this all.
“People like to write things that sound good, even if they don’t quite mean the right thing.” Ah, that didn’t take long. That’s Vernon talking, in an interview I conducted with him last summer while working on a story about his new album. We were talking about his relationship with Kanye West and his thoughts on how Ye is handled by the media, but the conversation seems just applicable to Vernon's own PR trajectory now. “There’s too much accountability with the media, it’s not like accountability with friends, it’s different,” he said. “They hold you accountable for something you said or something they thought you were... It’s ridiculous book-burning sh*t, or something, it’s weird.”
Much in the same way that people have expressed concern over the blogosphere’s quick build-up and rabid deconstruction of Lana Del Rey, it seems that Vernon has fallen prey to online media’s tendency to reduce everything into easily digestible soundbites. People want to know whether or not Justin Vernon is a sellout, as if whether you have integrity or have no soul is very cut-and-dry, black and white thing; it makes it easier to rush into writing a hand-wringing report about Vernon showing “signs of duress” and supposing that he’s cracking under the pressure of his newfound fame.
While that Billboard quote has gotten the most traction this week, it’s actually the interview he conducted with New York Magazine at the same Bushmills party that seems closer to his true thoughts on the whole circus. He doesn’t really care about the Grammys, never has, but he’s going to wear a nice suit and attend with his parents because he knows that it’s the kind of thing that will make them proud. Sounds like something an actual person would say, doesn’t it? Imagine that.
I know I’m fighting a losing battle, here, and my attempts to humanize artists regardless of their “stature” doesn’t fit in with the average reader’s expectations of what you might find on a music blog. But as we head into the Grammys this Sunday, it’s something that’s been on my mind and something that I think is worth a harder look.
For now, I’ll leave you with another previously unpublished excerpt from one of my conversations with Vernon, which sheds a bit more light on his character and his (not all that controversial, actually quite typical) thoughts on things like MTV and, yes, the Grammys.
Do you ever feel like there are points where your success is sort of spiraling out of control?
Vernon: Yeah. I talked to Ian MacKaye [of Fugazi] on the phone yesterday for this Under the Radar magazine interview thing, and so I asked him a bunch of questions like that, because I’ve been thinking about it lately. Not about the fame thing, but about the band thing and the career thing, and how much a business becomes a part of what you have to do to stay making money. So I was asking him a bunch of questions, and long story short, he comes around and just says, “I’m not an expansionist.” I’ve just thought about that word for the last three days, and thought that you can just choose to do what you want, versus what there is this magnetic pull in the industry for you to do. It’s not like somebody’s fault or some conspiracy, people just fall into sort of knowing they should make money, and they do forget about a bunch of stuff.
If you ever get to that point where it starts to feel like it’s starting to tip over, how do you reign it in and find your center again?
Well, I never felt like I was tipping over, but I just started to calmly think about it. Like Ian was saying, “Dude, just do whatever you’re going to do, and don’t feel bad about if you f**k up, just try to be a good person.” So that’s what I feel like I’ve been doing. He was talking about what punk music meant back then and how it was real, and how now, punk music is an MTV channel. You gotta think about that sometimes, you know? Punk is a f***ing Grammy award.
What do you think?
Tweet

The Local Current Blog is made possible in part by the Minnesota Legacy Amendment's Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund.
Comments
Are you seriously calling out your replacement dude at City Pages for over-blogging about Bon Iver? This must be about your fifth BI post in the same time frame. Let along the tediously "meta" implications of you putting this much work into what you yourself call a non-story. I like your writing and you guys do an awesome job with local music in general but it seems to me Vernon and his fans would be plenty happy to see you shift some attention elsewhere.
The previous commenter raises a good point, and I wonder if some people are even capable of realizing when they're being ironic anymore. It's hypocritical at that point. What I find more unbearable is all of the self praise. Great article about Andrea Swensson, Andrea Swensson. You're just a selfless martyr, sacrificing yourself for your high moral standards and fighting the virtuous fight, aren't you? I'm sure your friends all agree, but you have to see that no one else cares about you like your friends do. You have to consider your audience when you write - we're not all here to pat you on the back. If all you want to do is promote yourself, while claiming to be someone who cares about lofty ideals, that's not journalism, that's firstly totally pathetic, and even worse, it's completely hypocritical.
Density, I was using Reed's posts as an example, not "calling him out," though I understand the tendency to reduce a dialog like this one to some sort of beef (it's the internet, after all). No beef, though, just sharing my thoughts on the different ways one can approach this sort of topic.
And Wow... I'm not sure what perspective you approached this from, but I don't think this piece has anything to do with me. If you'd like to discuss the actual arguments presented instead of your perception of my personal character, I'm all ears.
I've never been a fan of "why did you even write this?" as a critique, so I'll address the content of the post itself. In short, I agree with what I think you're saying, here - the amount of scrutiny is entirely out of proportion to the topic. And it's because of a simple and I think highly defendable decision.
A couple points of personal interest. While I realize the culture almost demands that we parse an artist's every word, I think in this case we're missing the point by doing so. One could paraphrase Vernon's intent very simply into a sentence like "I didn't want to play without my band." And isn't that something he should be lauded for? He's acknowledging the fact that his band made vital contributions to the record the Academy is recognizing and saying, in essence, that he'd rather not be on stage without them. I say bravo, and that's the kind of person you want to be in a band with.
Lastly, I don't think I'm ever going to fault an artist with an indie background like Vernon for not playing along with the recording industry. They had very little to do with the success he's experiencing. He owes them absolutely nothing, and I see nothing wrong with his attitude at all - if anything he's being a little too nice about it all, but you do what you have to do for your parents.
Thanks, Andrea, for adding this new aspect to the Current - it's greatly appreciated.
I've written about Justin Vernon a lot in a short time here, and as long as he's the closest local tie to a nationally discussed topic like the Grammys, it's something that people should expect. Love them or hate them (I kinda do), this yearly award show has a huge effect on our music industry -- all the way down -- and has the power to turn a band's fortunes even more than a good Pitchfork score.
Most of the discussion in the stories I've written has had more to do with the failures on the part of the Grammy Awards, and how they pertain to Bon Iver. They do a piss-poor job connecting with artists and a worse job promoting them. The show is a over-long, affair loaded with awkward collaborations, and the nominations are mostly devoid of anyone interesting or worthy. Justin Vernon is one of the few nominated musicians who was brave enough to articulate that, and so here we are.
By the way, this blog never felt like a "calling out" to me. But, if anyone is equipped to put Gimme Noise in the hot seat, it's my colleague and friend Andrea Swensson. She'll at least sign her name.
What does it take to get some Lana D coverage up in this godforsaken Hoth? C'mon, you guys.
Andrea, I suppose I just found this paragraph to be one of the most pretentious and annoying things I've ever read:
"I know I’m fighting a losing battle, here, and my attempts to humanize artists regardless of their “stature” doesn’t fit in with the average reader’s expectations of what you might find on a music blog. But as we head into the Grammys this Sunday, it’s something that’s been on my mind and something that I think is worth a harder look."
Add to that the fact that this whole article is basically ripping on other blogs and proposing that your take on things is so much better than theirs, and I'd say yes, this is really an article about you. You are not writing about music. You're writing about press, and proposing you are better press than a bunch of other people higher up on the chain than you. If it were true that you were better, you would not be the one saying so, obviously. I just think it looks tacky and small minded, and I can't believe that this kind of "reporting" is actually posted as some kind of news on here. Anyway, I don't usually read this stuff so maybe it's all just supposed to be insider cat fighting? Who knows. Good luck blogging.
Well said, Wow.